On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 10:17:52AM -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:40:52PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 04:56:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 04:00:22PM +0000, Bruynooghe Floris wrote: > > > > int main() > > > > > > An addition to what everyone else said, this really should be > > > > > > int main(int argc, char** argv) > > > > > > to truly satisfy the pedant within :) > > > > Doesn't matter if you aren't using them. '()' in C means "unspecified > > arguments", as opposed to "no arguments" which is '(void)'. > > In a definition, () and (void) are identical. It's only in the > declaration where () means a fixed but unspecified number of arguments > and only crazy people write declarations for "main".
I stand corrected, then. Although 'info libc' does say that (void) is OK for main() in ISO C. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
