On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:05:13 -0800 Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> begin  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  quotation:
> 
> > Is there a debian package for Sylpheed?
> 
> Yes, in Woody and Sid.
> 
> > BTW -- why would using an X mail application exclude you from also
> > running mutt?
> 
> It's not so much "prevented" as "made sufficiently painful". I tried
> using Sylpheed and mutt together several months ago, and at that time it
> did not work well because Sylpheed and mutt used incompatible ways of
> indicating that a message has been read. I would read messages in one
> program, then run the other and see all those messages still marked as
> new. That was too annoying for words, considering the amount of mail I
> get every day. So, since I need a non-X MUA for ssh sessions from remote
> locations over slow connections, I just stopped using Sylpheed.

Interesting.  Is there a Standard Way of indicating that MH mails
have been read?

-- 
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.        Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]        |
| Jefferson, LA  USA      http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81    |
|                                                            |
| 484,246 sq mi are needed for 6 billion people to live, 4   !
! persons per lot, in lots that are 60'x150'.                |
! That is ~ California, Texas and Missouri.                  !
! Alternatively, France, Spain and The United Kingdom.       |
+------------------------------------------------------------+

Reply via email to