On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 21:36:18 -0500 Bob Thibodeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I'd try Sylpheed after seing mention of it on this > list, but never felt like configuring another client. Now that > I've read it doesn't play nice with mutt, I'll just remove it. I've got it working reasonable nicely with mutt/procmail. The only issue is that slypheed uses its own mechanism for marking mail as read rather than a sequences file. This means that when I use mutt, I see the mail thats new since the last time i ran mutt, and Sylpheed shows whats new since I last ran sylpheed. This is only a very minor annoyance though, and I think I'll stick with this configuration for a while. I was particularly impressed with Sylpheeds GPG handling, something that Balsa, which I was using previously, lacks. Of course migrating to Sylpheed means converting your mailboxes into MH format, and modifying your procmail scripts to use rcvstore. Alan
