> Uh, what? bash is a bourne shell (and then some). ash is probably a > more "pure" bourne shell; it's not clear to me whether it strives more > for bourne or POSIX compliance. Who told you debian didn't have a > bourne shell? I'd request that they reach between their legs, grasp > their neck firmly and pull hard ... they just _might_ pull their head > out of their ass. Oracle support says it must be the bourne shell, not the bourne again shell. Most likely an excuse to put the pressure on somebody else, but that's what their tech said.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
