On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Grant Edwards wrote: > I notice that "woody" installs a 2.2 kernel instead of a 2.4 > kernel. Are the reasons behind that decision?
2.2 was current when woody was in development. > Is the plan to have "stable" 3.0 run a 2.2 kernel? Yes. > I'm planning on building a custom-tailored 2.4.x kernel-image > package for above-mentioned product, but I'm wondering if I > should also include a similarly configured 2.2 kernel-image... Your call. -- Baloo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
