I've been getting some errors from the kernel. Should I send them to
someone and if so, who?
Here is an example:
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 00000008
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: printing eip:
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: c012aec4
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: *pde = 00000000
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: Oops: 0000
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: CPU: 0
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: EIP: 0010:[fput+12/208] Not tainted
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: EFLAGS: 00010286
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: eax: cb4b8fe0 ebx: cb4b8fe0 ecx: c55672c8 edx:
d0762000
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: esi: fffffe00 edi: 00000000 ebp: 00000000 esp:
d0763f9c
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: Process logcheck (pid: 15689, stackpage=d0763000)
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: Stack: cb4b8fe0 fffffe00 00000000 00000080 c012a463
d0762000 00000080 bffff2fc
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: bffff2bc c0106b0b 00000003 bffff2fc 00000080
00000080 bffff2fc bffff2bc
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: 00000003 0000002b 0000002b 00000003 401243d4
00000023 00000297 bffff28c
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: Call Trace: [sys_read+195/204] [system_call+51/56]
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel:
May 2 06:02:03 tc kernel: Code: 8b 75 08 ff 4b 14 0f 94 c0 84 c0 0f 84 ac 00
00 00 53 e8 8d
--
Our doctrine is based on liberty. In fact, private property and
liberty, in our eyes are one and the same; for one man is made the
owner of his own services by his right and his ability to dispose
of them as he sees fit. Communism destroys liberty, for it permits
no one to dispose freely of his own labor.
-- Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)
Rick Pasotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.niof.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
