also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.05.06.2302 +0200]: > 212.54.xxx.12 <router> 192.168.14.1 > | > | > | > 192.168.14.31 <fw> 192.168.31.1 > | > | > | > host> 192.168.31.2
oh, and before i forget, 192.168.31.2 can ping any of the one-legged hosts in 192.168.14.0/24. 192.168.31.2 can *not* ping any other fw like 192.168.14.31 in 192.168.14.0/24, even though the fw allows icmp ping requests. (the fw's are fw-1's on windoze, so debugging's like impossible) 192.168.14.17 and any other host on 192.168.14.0/24 can not ping 192.168.14.1 with the static routes in place. if i remove the static routes on the router, then everything's fine. this looks to me like a massive linux routing problem, or i really screwed up (which is hard to imagine for i've done this things many times before). the router is debian woody, custom 2.4.18 kernel with HTB+IMQ (QoS) patches. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED] "women love us for our defects. if we have enough of them, they will forgive us everything, even our gigantic intellects." -- oscar wilde
pgpdAh8U53uNw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
