Please do not cross-post to so many lists with general comments. Following up to debian-user.
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:54:37PM +0700, Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: > BTW, I tried to find out (in FHS and Debian Policy) the > differences between /usr/doc/ and /usr/share/doc as well as > why some documents are symbolic linked and why some are not. > May I know why? You looked in exactly the right places. FHS says (4.11.1): <quote> The /usr/share hierarchy is for all read-only architecture independent data files. </quote> Which is clearly where documentation should go. The symlinks are a transition mechanism, described in the Debian Policy Manual: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s13.4 -- - mdz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]