On 24-May-2002 Glen Lee Edwards wrote: > Adam, > > I'm not going to rewrite the lisp code on xemacs to automatically add in a > Reply-to: header that matches one of the dozen or so email addresses I use. > All > my boxes have their own static IP address, and a reverse DNS lookup matches > the > DSN address to the machine and my userid. If that isn't good enough, I > suggest > you just add me to your spam list and block all my mail. Anybody spammer can > add in a bogus Reply-to: header. > > Don't take this personally. If some programmer thinks that just because a > Reply-to: header exists that this is proof it isn't spam, then he's the > problem, > not me. >
Then kill then Reply-To header line. You make it more difficult to respond to you because most mailers want to use Reply-To if it is listed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]