On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 03:57, Colin Watson wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:16:01PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Why does "apt-get -u -d upgrade" suddenly say "and 0 not upgraded"? > > It should say "886 not upgraded". (It worked ~1 week ago, when last > > I refreshed my machine.) > > The "not upgraded" isn't a total over all packages; it refers to > packages where apt knows about a newer version but isn't upgrading it > for other reasons. For example, I have kaffe on hold: > > The following packages have been kept back > kaffe > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
OK. Still, though, I'm pretty amazed that none of the ~850 woody packages I've installed have had any new releases in the past 10 days. Is all that on hold pending the 3.0 release? (I was able to grab mozilla 1+rc2-3 from sid, so I know that my apt-get system isn't broken...) -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81 | | | | "I have created a government of whirled peas..." | | Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, 12-May-2002, | ! CNN, Larry King Live | +---------------------------------------------------------+ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
