>>"David" == David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> We have decided to release for 11 architectures, because that >> pleases our muse. David> Point 4. of http://www.debian.org/social_contract says "Our David> Priorities are Our Users and Free Software". I think even you David> will agree that, prima facie, my argument for optimizing the David> greatest possible user good looks more consistent with these David> priorities than your statement above. Our users. Not our users of the most popular architectures. _all_ our users. David> Do you really believe that the Debian community should not David> "worry about the rate of return of our effort"? Your argument What debian community? Who gets to decide how developer time is spent? Who do you think has any input in prioritizing the work that is to be done, and why do you think they have the right to do so? David> seems to be that we should not do so, because Microsoft does David> so (therefore it must be bad?). In free software, the tenet is those who do the work make the rules. If that makes us an elitist cabal, well, we always were. If that means that Debian no longer meets your ideal, well, sorry. What you are missing is even a modicum of understanding of the motivation for the people who put in the effort and do the work for Debian -- I certainly do not do this (working 20 hours a week, over and above the 50-60 I do for work, and trying to keep the house and lawn in shape, etc (I also happen to run an active D&D campaign, but well)) for the unwashed masses. Do you know what motivates the developers? Developers most certainly do _not_ live to serve. David> I think the Debian leadership made a mistake in its decision Debian leadership? The project leader has no say in deciding what architectures one releases. Indeed, a large number of sub projects must come together (boot floppies, build daemons, porting team, number of packages up to date, etc), and some one has then to finally convince the RM that the port is ready for release. There is no central leadership that makes these decisions. There is no command from up on high "And behold, we shall release for 15 architectures next release. Pass along the bull whips and lick the developers into shape". Indeed, the decision to add an architecture is a grass roots effort, and bubbles up from below - by the people who actually do the work. David> to support more architectures than Debian could without David> negatively impacting the mainstream base. Amid mounting David> criticism from the user base, the posture of many of those David> invested in that decision has been to adopt a cabal-like David> attitude ("this is our project and we deign to let you use David> it") rather than to try to reach out to the David> community. Frankly, your statement above is exemplary in this David> regard. I'm afraid that route will lead use away from the David> free-for-all, inclusive Linux world toward the high quality, David> but rather austere and unfriendly BSD world. As far as I have been aware, the majority of people working for free software work because it pleases their muse (or scratches their own particular itch). The user base helps by helping make the software better; in return for getting to use it. Anyone can participate -- by helping with bug reports and fizxes, patches, etc; and even getting a say in how debian works by committing themselves to Debian; no one tells any other volunteer how to spend their time. All that is needed is essentially "Show us the code" (or help us improve it). People are not excluded because we are the holiest of the holy and outsiders are dirt. There is no core Debian team. And users certainly are not in control; and popularity has never been a Debian goal. The ``community participation'' does have limitations. Telling me how to spend my time comes with the obligation of helping me pay my mortgage. My posted rates are $250 an hour. Anyone telling me how to spend my time has to pony up the moolah. manoj -- What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon. Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]