Thanks for chiming in, Collin. > Ah, yes. So the security team will have to support both potato and > woody, because both will be stable on different architectures. Package > maintainers will have to support wildly different versions of their > packages in stable. All this until the other architectures get a new > stable release - which, if we only cared about raw numbers of users > rather than developers willing to do the work, would most likely be > never.
This is an important point. Woody, however, is supposed to support 11 arches to potato's 6. One could drop the 5 new arches without encountering this problem. Would dropping these 5 not help? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
