On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 02:08, Paul Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > OK, I'm trying the PAM route again, since I cranked debug up a bit and > got some interesting data... > > 2002-06-20 22:49:49 Authentication failed for cm099.55.234.24.lvcm.com > (skylos.dogpawz.com) [24.234.55.99]: Unable to authenticate at present: > Module is unknown Sounds like one of the modules in your /etc/pam.d/exim does not actually exist. Often, the debian-provided examples include pam_pwdb.so even though there _is_ no pam_pwdb.so AFAIK. verify that your pam file only uses pam modules that actually exist under /lib/security
Of course, that is just a guess :) -Mark > > /etc/pam.d/exim exists containing what d-man previously suggested, as > well as the previously mentioned PAM login parts for > /etc/exim/exim.conf. > > - -- > Baloo > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE9EsLLNtWkM9Ny9xURAraYAJ0aIpzjWkMxa92ZDnbBoNL6ZP5IpACdHmZ8 > xICV8FjkR8eUiCoiebXujHg= > =b7Yo > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
