On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:34:52 +0200 "J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip, snip> > That's because Debian tries to stick as closely as is reasonably > possible to official gcc releases. "2.96" (of which there appear to be > many versions which are difficult to distinguish) has a lot of issues; > it has e.g. been known to build gnumeric binaries which produced > extremely inaccurate results; gnumeric's CVS version (and some other > software as well AFAIK) has been changed to refuse compilation with > "2.96". > > Your best option is to go for 3.1. but 3.1 is only in unstable! In testing it only goes till 3.0. How does compare 3.0 with 3.1? TIA Marcelo -- Marcelo Chiapparini DFT-IF/UERJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
