[edited for brevity] On Saturday 23 July 2005 15:39, Gayle Lee Fairless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Jules Dubois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Do the Debian kernel source packages use a new naming convention or >> is this new package a vanilla kernel (or something else)? >> > The linux-source-* is the new convention because hurd will be a future > choice [...] > >> Should I use GCC 4.0 for compiling the kernel (and ignore the warnings) >> or continue to use GCC 3.3? >> > It appears that you should use gcc 3.3 for 2.6.12. For those who might be interested, I built a "Custom" kernel from the new linux-source-2.6.12, using GCC 3.3, a slightly modified kernel Makefile, and make-kpkg. It builds properly, installs properly, and works properly. > If I understood the comments, gcc 4.0 will be used > for later versions (probably starting with 2.6.13). I'll cross that bridge when it comes to me. Thank you for your assistance. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
