On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:15:05 +0100 Pooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I'm trying, is to have Rosegarden4 working, which is ok now, > (except jack lost few samples). > The timidity acting as a server eat 20% of my CPU, is it normal (even > when nothing is playing) ?
Soundblaster live cards are cheap these days and the hardware synthesizer is supported using the asfxload utility from the awesfx package to load soundfonts. For your usage that seems like a much better solution. Sound wise I think timidity holds up pretty well to the soundblaster live when using the same soundfont, but timidity does use a significant amount of processor resources and there will be some clipping in passages with rapidly played notes. Later, Seeker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]