On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 20:47 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 20 November 2005 20:23, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >On Sat, 19 Nov 2005, Carl Fink wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:46:12AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > wrote: > >> > Not again this crap. Unsubbing everyone from UOL is the lazy way > >> > out, there are better methods to track down the exact mail address > >> > causing trouble. > >> > >> Use one. Yourself. Now. Who is the problem? > > > >I don't have access to gluck.d.o, or I would have. Watch the tone. > > > >And I think a less lazy/kneejerk method than unsubbing everyone > > @uol.com.br *WAS* used, or did you not notice you are not receiving > > antispam uol mails anymore for at least 24h now? > > Ahh, but I am. Now I'm trying to determine which mailing list is still > contaminated.
That's odd, because I'm not receiving them either. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA python -c 'print len(str(2**300000))' 90309 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]