On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:02:47 +0100 (MET)
Szakacsits Szabolcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> 
> > Is NTFS support safe to use for writing? 
> 
> It depends on what NTFS implementation you use. There are almost a dozen
> different one which people greatly confuse and they often credit one's
> faults to an unrelated one.

I have standard Debian linux-images, i guess it's the open source one...
 
> If you use the one from the open source Linux NTFS project (but not the
> original NT4 NTFS driver which were experimental, developed by others and
> kept trashing NTFS) then yes it was always safer than ext3, xfs or
> reiserfs, mainly because until very recently it implemented only file
> overwrite without change to the file size and volume resizing so basically
> nobody would have much chance to corrupt anything even if they had tried
> very hard.
> 
> > Are all functions implemented?
> 
> Only read, not all writer. And probably some bugs will appear too as more
> write related features will be implemented. Just like in case of any other
> filesystems or softwares.
> 
> > If no time to answer could you just please direct me where to look for
> > this information. I know this is constant development, but i would be
> > very interested in trying it out.
> 
> http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
> 
>       Szaka
> 

Will check it out, thanks

Andrei


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to