Hi On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Mark Lijftogt wrote:
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:21:50 +0100 > From: Mark Lijftogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I'm in the unlucky position to be searching for a possible solution for > a header issue that a java application is giving me. This java > application POP's it's email to distribute it later on. Now, in most > cases this goes without a hitch, except when the adress on which the > java application checks is bcc'ed. > > For this reason the coders decided it was a wise step to push the issue > forward to the admins, requestion for every e-mail that passes on thrue > a X-evelope-to: header, with the recepient after that. > > Now, I'm unsure how to approach this.. or how I could approach this, but > more important.. how I should approach this. header_checks and UCE rules > alike, in the duration that I was reading I'm unsure if that would be > the road to take (and a "deadline" is coming insight rather quickly). > > Any pcre or other regex option availible that ADD's a headerline? Unfortunately it is not clear from your description how the mail is being handled. When you say "This java application POP's it's email", is it always POPing from a single mailbox, or could it POP from various mailboxes? Anyway, if you just want to add a header when you know the envelope recipient, just pipe the message through this filter: formail -A "X-envelope-to: $recipient" If the recipient is not defined then that is another story . . . Regards Jim Holland System Administrator MANGO - Zimbabwe's non-profit e-mail service -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]