Hello, I have a question about when can a package enter testing, particularly when does it break other packages.
I could imagine that, for example: packages A can be added to testing, packages U upgraded and R removed if for any debian system, upgrading packages in U and removing packages in R doesn't yield any broken packages (that is, unmet depends or conflicts) However, this has flaws. Imagine the situation, in which there are packages A and B, previously unrelated, and a new version of A is coming in and it Conflicts: B. In that case, systems having both A and B will have to remove one. Is that OK? In any case, I don't see any definition of "A breaks B". Jiri Palecek ______________________________________________________________ Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS! Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
