> Am 2006-02-23 14:49:15, schrieb Jan C. Nordholz: > > Then your permission bits on /dev/console and/or /dev/tty0 are not > > as strict: > > > > ] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ll /dev/tty0 /dev/console > > ] crw------- 1 root tty 5, 1 2006-02-23 08:17 /dev/console > > ] crw------- 1 root root 4, 0 2005-03-29 21:30 /dev/tty0 > On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 10:49:27PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > I have a Woody standard installation and do not need to manipulate the > perms: > > +---[ 'stdin' ]--------------------------------------------------------- > | > | [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/] ll /dev/tty0 /dev/tty1 /dev/tty2 / > | dev/tty3 /dev/tty4 /dev/tty5 /dev/console > [...] > | crw------- 1 michelle private 4, 0 27. Sep 05:28 /dev/tty0
... but you have to admit that this is a strange ownership, isn't it? I don't have a woody system at hand for reference, but all sarge hosts I've come across so far had tty0 owned by root:root. Regards, Jan -- Jan C. Nordholz <jckn At gmx net>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
