On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:07:06 -0500 Kevin Mark wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 04:31:25PM -0600, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 04:19:11PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:54:38PM -0500, Hugo Jackson wrote: >>>> >>>> I just installed etch. >>> >>> Etch has not been released. you are using 'testing' which is the >>> development stream to produce 'Etch'. >> >>>From http://www.debian.org/releases/: >> >> The current "testing" distribution is etch. >> >> It's still called etch during development; it just doesn't get a >> version number until release. > > Hi Matthew, > This to me is misleading. I dont like to say Etch/testing and > Etch/stable, it is a confusing notion.
No, it isn't. Right now, etch = testing. At some point, etch
will be released, at which time etch no longer = testing, but
instead etch = stable. The original poster's statement was
perfectly fine.
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
