On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 05:15:06PM -0500, Kent West wrote: > Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > On Saturday 22 April 2006 14:14, Steve Lamb wrote: > > > >> Monique Y. Mudama wrote: > >> > >>> Well, debian is pretty obvious about its purpose. It's a link right > >>> from the front page. Maybe people should be choosing other distros if > >>> they don't like bullet item number one of the social contract. Debian > >>> without the social contract would be just another distro. In other > >>> words, there would be no point to using debian without the contract. > >>> > >> Funny, the #1 point for most people is apt, not the social contract. > >> #1 for *you* maybe. > >> > > Include my name in the list of "people for whom socila contract is the #1 > > point". I use debian because of its commitment to free software (which is > > part > > of social contract) not because it has apt or some other cool software. > > > > raju > > > > Include my name in the list of "people for whom social contract is the > #1 point" also. When Debian ceases to be Free, then Debian ceases to > retain my loyalty. > > -- > Kent
1 more here. A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature