On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:30:34 -0400, Stephen wrote: >On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:20:43PM -0600 or thereabouts, Joseph Smidt wrote: >> There is talk about the smart package manager. It claims it will handle >> package managing better than APT. Is this true or propaganda? If it is >> true, will there be a future switch from APT to this SMART? Could it be a >> potential etch +1 goal? Just wondering. > >Are you referring to Aptitude ? It's available either in a curses >display (I think it's curses) or from the command line.
No, he's referring to smart: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_Package_Manager /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://therning.org/magnus Software is not manufactured, it is something you write and publish. Keep Europe free from software patents, we do not want censorship by patent law on written works. Unreadable code, Why would anyone use it? Learn a better way. -- Geoff Kuenning's contribution to the 2004 Perl Haiku Contest, Haikus about Perl - 'Dishonerable Mention' winner
pgpeQaUBStrtu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
