On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:47:12PM -0400 or thereabouts, Carl Fink wrote: > > In fact, the standard is not open. > > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWF#Licensing. > > In any case, "Flash" (which is a program) is not open-source, any more than > Acrobat is just because PDF is, in fact, open.
As with Acrobat, Adobe publishes the specification. That is what I meant by an Open Standard. I never once mentioned licensing, nor said the license was open. Two very different kettle of fish. Actionscript is open as well, although again Adobe is in charge of the specification. <http://www.adobe.com/licensing/developer/> -- Regards Stephen +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ If you laid all of our laws end to end, there would be no end. -- Mark Twain +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature