On (30/08/06 07:23), Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On 8/29/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:32:44PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > >> Hi, > >> Anyone know what the 'ds' in versions of recent GLibC in unstable mean? > >> > >Daniel Stone. I believe he incorporates some significant patches and > >wants to differentiate between his customized version and the upstream > >version upon which it is based. > > But I don't see Daniel's name on the changelog. Are you mistaken? >
The latest .ds upload has a changelog which mentions the removal of non-free documentation. Perhaps the ds is used to indicate that the tarball is not the original upstream. A lot of packages use dsfg for that, but there is no rule. James -- James Westby -- GPG Key ID: B577FE13 -- http://jameswestby.net/ seccure key - (3+)k7|M*edCX/.A:n*N!>|&7U.L#9E)Tu)T0>AM - secp256r1/nistp256 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
