On 07.09.06 23:04, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thursday 07 September 2006 18:51, Cameron L. Spitzer wrote: > > [This message has also been posted to linux.debian.user.] > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > qmail has the least Debian support, due to uninteresting > > > licensing issues, but has a large user community and excellent > > > documentation (www.lifewithqmail.org, qmail.org). It runs nicely > > > on Debian systems, and is unlikely to require upgrading. > > > > Sorry, no. On anything bigger than your personal mail > > server, Qmail is going to require replacing with a modern MTA. > > There's a reason to not like it other than just djb-damage?
googling for "qmail bugs wishlist" might help to make your view. the most annoying parts are accept-then-bounce behaviour and mail unbundling (mail to more recipients at the same place will be delivered for each recipient extra) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Where do you want to go to die?" [Microsoft] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
