On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 12:58:49AM -0400, H.S. wrote: > Others have given you good replies. I would add that do not name your > output file (the executable) as "test". A "test" command already exists > in Linux.
I don't believe it matters much. Only the crazy and the inept have . in their $PATH and it's not in there by default. If he has put it in there then well, it's a good way to learn I guess. :) -- "To the extent that we overreact, we proffer the terrorists the greatest tribute." - High Court Judge Michael Kirby -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]