On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:39:54 +0100 Alan Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 30 September 2006 09:01, Mario Frasca wrote: > > Hi Benjami, > > > > found your message looking for 'syslog' on this group. your > > questions are quite in line with what I'm seeing on my system. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uptime > > 09:57:29 up 9 days, 22:57, 6 users, load average: 3.47, 3.81, > > 3.14 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /var/log/syslog* > > -rw-r----- 1 root adm 0 Sep 27 09:11 /var/log/syslog > > -rw-r----- 1 root adm 641461 Sep 30 09:55 /var/log/syslog.0 > > -rw-r----- 1 root adm 105707 Sep 27 09:10 /var/log/syslog.1.gz > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ tail -1 /var/log/syslog.0 > > Sep 30 09:59:30 kruiskruid ntpd[1677]: synchronized to > > 83.67.145.167, stratum 3 > > > > notice the date of syslog.0, as compared to syslog... > > it looks as if syslogd was writing into syslog.0, leaving alone > > syslog. > > > > I have this too - seems like a recent update to the system. > It's probably an effect of this bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=388260 -- Liam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
