On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:43:43PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > T.J. Duchene wrote: > > > Don't expect Outlook, Thunderbird, Mutt, Pine, or even Evolution to do > > anything more than simple blob sorts or spam checking. > > You mean like Thunderbird having a built-in Bayesian scanner which catches > spam my rather tight SA install lets slip through? Amazingly most of it here > on d-u. > > Or that it has anti-scam filters built in that catch what SA and clamav > let slip through? > > Or the fact that Sylpheed-claws and KMail both have for some time had > hooks for SA scanning? > > Or that Sylpheed-claws has hooks for ClamAV scanning? > > Oh, er, sorry, you were telling us unwashed non-mail admins about these > "primitive" things called MUAs. Carry on.
Most of what you say kind of proves the OP's point. You mention 'hooks' which means using programs _external_ to the email client. -- David Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
