* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: [snip] > > > That should at least ease the ulgly-line-problem a little. > > That's twice in two days I've seen ugly spelled as ulgly, and I don't > recall ever having seen it spelled this way before? Is a cosmic > spelling change starting to take effect? Is it a conspiracy? It can't > be a coincidence, can it? > > -- hendrik
Makes sense if you think about it. Shouldn't ugly itself be ugly. Well, there you go. Now it can be ulgly. It even sounds more like it should. Patrick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]