On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 22:09 -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote: > Jochen Schulz wrote: > > >Marc Shapiro: > > > > > >>Marc Shapiro wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Jochen Schulz wrote: > >>> > >>>But, once it does get into Sid, or whatever testing will be, then it > >>>is almost certain to get backported so that those of us that prefer a > >>>'stable' machine can get to all the sites that want 'the most current > >>>version of Flash' which seems to include sites like nickjr.com and > >>>noggin.com. Both of these worked until recently, but now I am having > >>>problems with them, and my daughter (almost 6 years old) really likes > >>>the games. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Ooops! I missed that you were suggesting that Etch would not make the > >>December release, and were not referring to Flash Player 9. > >> > >> > > > >I did refer to FP9, I only mentioned FP8 because I have never seen a > >site telling my I need FP9, but there are a couple that reject browsers > >with at least FP8. > > > >But what I actually wanted to say: FP is closed-source. I do not think > >that there is a way to backport it. > > > > > Right! My brain slipped. But if the installer is there for Flash > Player 9, then where is the actual binary. I just looked on the adobe > site, again, and when I go to download Flash Player all it offers me is > 7.0.68.0, which is the same version that I have had installed for what > seems like forever.
Been gone for a while... but I am back. To answer your question Marc: http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]