On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 17:20:47 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 09.01.07 09:58, Steve Lamb wrote: >> Recently a ton of mail running through SA has been hitting the soft-limit >> for spam. I have it set tight, 5.0 for mark and pass. 7.0 for reject at >> SMTP. Mail from this list, from Exim's list, mail from an MMORPG I play and >> from a motorcycle web site I went to all got blocked. Ok, so maybe someone >> got pissed at the MMORPG and Motorcycle site, but Debian and Exim!? Here's >> the snippet of score from the latest exim mail to be blocked: >> >> * 2.8 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL blocklist >> * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com] >> * 3.8 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist >> * [URIs: exim.org computurn.com eiffel.com] >> >> A score of 6.6 because of exim.org being a listed URL? Obviously these >> lists are faulty yet the scoring is extremely high? What prompted SA people >> to include such drek and throw the scoring completely out the window!? > > is exim.org listed in those lists? I'd look at reasons of listing.
7.0 is a pretty aggressive score for rejecting at SMTP time. I think that if you configure it to be like that, you are guaranteed to have some spurious blocking. Try relaxing the reject-at-SMTP score (I /dev/null mails at 22.0). HTH, Reid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
