-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 01/28/07 16:26, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:40:52PM +0100, Norbert Preining wrote: >> On Sam, 27 Jan 2007, Piotr Dziubinski wrote: >>> Iceweasel and Firefox are a different products, very similar, but >>> different. >> Can YOU please explain me what *important* differences there are? > [...] >> Otherwise I would like to see what kind of OPERATIONAL difference you >> have found: > > There is actually an operational difference. In the about:config page > the setting general.useragent.extra.firefox is set to > "Iceweasel/2.0.0.1". Looks harmless, but it stopped me from logging > on to a website. It would only let me in when I set it to > "Firefox/2.0.0". > > Note: that website lists only Firefox 1.0 on Windows as supported > (among a few other proprietary browsers). But this setting made the > difference between being able to use it and getting a "browser > unsported" page. I can imagine less technical users being at a loss > in a similar situation.
No, that's a problem with the web site. Go to Mozilla.org, and you'll see that the current version in 2.0.0.1. http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFvTEBS9HxQb37XmcRAiXDAJ4y8T0spbWWg3xUfNLeR4YqDR9qUQCdEsFC VeKBjS+ZK8bLQeb0llFyp3E= =eVGX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]