On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:05:14 -0600 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Out of curiosity, why don't you implement IMAP? > > > > Because at the moment it's all on the same computer. I am thinking > > to go for IMAP as soon as I get my firewall back on line (hdd is > > down), > > Ah, a security issue. No, it's just that I don't see the reason of IMAP on the same computer. If I were to transform my firewall machine in a mailserver then IMAP would be the best choice to access it. > > though this would mean I don't have my mails on my laptop. > > Sure it would. That's the whole point of IMAP: Internet Mail ACCESS > Protocol. On line yes, but offline... and yes, I know I can download the mail also on the laptop, but that would beat the whole purpose of having a centralised mailstore. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
