On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 10:24:54AM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote: > > The fetchmail daemon takes almost no memory nor CPU when idling, so > that's a weak argument for most machines (as long as we're not talking > about wireless routers etc.). > True. However, his earlier point about fetchmail's daemon functionality reinventing cron is quite strong. If it is not waiting for anything incoming, there is really not a good reason for it to implement its own daemon functionality.
Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
