-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > Roberto C. S�nchez wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:43:30PM -0400, Jim Hyslop wrote: >>> If I had immediately followed with some outrageous claim that Windows is >>> better and has fewer security holes because <insert some stupid reason>, >>> *THEN* you could accuse me of spreading FUD. >>> >> Windows *is* better, since Microsoft reports much fewer bugs than any >> Linux distribution :-) > > Windows *is* better, since it has more users than any other OS, and > those simply can't be wrong. The same applies to M$ office. > > Practically none of its users ever think of *why* this or that would be > better or worse than any of the alternatives.
Your logic is flawed. Are normal cars better than supercars? There are millions of normal cars, but only a few thousand supercars. Does that mean that the supercars are inferior? No, in this case it means that most people cannot afford them. As for Windows, most computers come with it, and people most people don't know that there are alternatives. With Office, it is a compatibility issue. People use Office because their contacts use it, and it is a vicious circle of upgrades just to remain compatible, meanwhile generating a lot of income for MS. Joe > Just my .02 > Johannes > > - -- Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGENOQiXBCVWpc5J4RAh43AKCqcegfjh6ViMqEJGrqgg3EOAUr6gCgvKo7 Lo9aFfy5FFMuNkxTwz/OTGM= =Nq/c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]