On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 21:31 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote: > On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 13:02 -0500, Robert J Rae wrote: > > > when I try to to install sarge as I have done many times via http, I > > now get warnings about kernel image removal and packages that have > > failed to install, web and mail packages that have worked fine in the > > past, so a little bit of reading points to etch upgrades having > > similar problems..........but I don't want to upgrade.....can I add > > some parameter at boot to just build a plain old sarge 3.1 > > ..........or is my only option to build from the cd's > > It's possible that an HTTP install from a Sarge CD might look for > 'stable' on the repositories? (Not sure, just thinking out loud)
To clarify - my point above is that 'stable' is no longer Sarge: and thus a Sarge net-install may not quite work any more. Dave. -- Please don't CC me on list messages! ... Dave Ewart - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] All email from me is now digitally signed, key from http://www.sungate.co.uk/ Fingerprint: AEC5 9360 0A35 7F66 66E9 82E4 9E10 6769 CD28 DA92
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
