On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 01:17:43PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 14:52:28 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 09:55:19PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 15:28:14 -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20070507.html > > > > > > You could have made this even funnier if you had posted it using a > > > debianhelp.org account ;) > > > > > > > LMAO. thanks! > > > > > > oh and that means > > > > :0 > > * ^.*debianhelp.org > > /dev/null > > > > is approved!!! > > It may be better to use > > * ^Message-Id:.*debianhelp.org > > otherwise there might be some collateral damage: Since debianhelp.org > puts this string into their (long and ugly) message IDs it tends to > propagate into other people's mail headers via the "In-Reply-To" and > "References" fields.
I'm not sure that's a bad thing. as disjointed as the threads with the debianhelp stuff already in there, they'd be even more so with it removed, but the messages that follow still intact. I suppose a killfile would be the way to go instead of using /dev/null. Then the whole sub-thread would disappear. Despite my many posts about this, I still have some reservations though. I am reluctant to be so draconian. I view it as a personal flaw. A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature