That is what I thought  Wackojacko has the answer in this thread it is
> because
> of having the vmlinuz and vmlinuz.old symbolic links in /boot it adds
> these
> as well. I removed them and updated grub manually I did not get the
> duplicates put the links back updated grub and there were the duplicates
> again. Which sucks because without the links it does not list my newest
> kernel in the grub splash screen first so I would have to select it
> manually
> instead of getting to boot into it without an action on my part.
>
> Stephen


Hi,
that's what I have in my /boot
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   70797 2007-03-26 18:32 config-2.6.18-4-k7
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root    4096 2007-05-14 09:47 grub
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4403522 2006-12-15 10:45 initrd.img-2.6.17-ra2.bak
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5025328 2007-05-11 14:24 initrd.img-2.6.18-4-k7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  722453 2007-03-27 00:45 System.map-2.6.18-4-k7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1268398 2007-03-27 00:45 vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-k7

as you can see there are no symlinks.

I have removed any other kernel but the recent one in lenny and still
update-grub adds recovery mode duplicates at evry run.

The strange thing I see in that initrd.img-2.6.17-ra2.bak file whose
origin is obscure to me, even if 'ra' is the suffix I use in --revision
option when using make-kpkg.

I have no other custom kernels installed, so I assume it is safe to remove
initrd.img-2.6.17-ra2.bak and send other feedbaks.

regards
raffaele


Just removed everything but kernel 2.6.18-4-k7, now /boot is

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   70797 2007-03-26 18:32 config-2.6.18-4-k7
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root    4096 2007-05-14 13:53 grub
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5025328 2007-05-11 14:24 initrd.img-2.6.18-4-k7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  722453 2007-03-27 00:45 System.map-2.6.18-4-k7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1268398 2007-03-27 00:45 vmlinuz-2.6.18-4-k7

running `update-grub && grep 'kernel 2.6.18-4-k7'  /boot/grub/menu.lst | wc
-l ` still outputs an increasing integer.

Regards
raffaele

a little oddity, my twin machine at home works perfectly...

Reply via email to