On Sunday 20 May 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 03:58:37PM -0400, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > On Sunday 20 May 2007, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > > It would be helpful if that code of conduct had its own page and > > > be enumerated so that it could be referred to directly when we > > > try to self-regulate. Eg: "Yoh WhatsYourName, this topic, while > > > interesting in a general sense, is rather OT. Please take it off > > > list, per the list code of conduct item 13 at > > > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/CodeOfConduct#13." > > > > This is different and it's close to what I mentioned earlier and I > > think may have been mentioned before. It combines several > > possibilities, but it, unfortunately, puts some more work on the > > list moderators. > > I'm not suggesting list moderators. We as the Debian-User community, > if there's a clear policy document, can self-regulate and remind each > other of the policy as needed.
I'd be okay with that, but just in a short sampling I've seen people that don't respond to other users. How are such people handled? Or maybe when they refuse to respond to the community as a whole, that's when the moderators would step in? I don't know if moderator is the right term, but I know there are people who police this list, or who can. Hal -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]