Hans du Plooy wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%23403863 > Thanks, there's some useful info. But they mostly just argue about > where the .ramfs should be put.
Ah, well, yes. > I'm really more interested in finding out why it needs to be a > ramfs. That I don't know. But if you find out I would be interesting in knowing too. Bob -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
