On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:34:36 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Ore writes:
> > > > I know that it's in the repository but I need the raw binary for 386.
>
> Why?
>
> I am afraid only statically linked binary can do that since many distros use
> different libraries. It will be huge and not flexible, andc even that might
> not work on some distros with special environments.
Actually no, like I Said in one of the posts I've 'cloned' (copied) all
the files related to ksh and passed to my system., actually no fancy
libraries needed, look
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7f98000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb7f73000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e4a000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fb0000)
> > On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:54:55 -0500 John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I don´t understand what you mean by ¨raw binary¨. What´s wrong with the
> > > binary in the ksh package?
>
> On 27.06.07 08:33, Orestes leal wrote:
> > Well, I don't speak english to good, I meant a Ksh Binary that works in
> > every linux distro, hope that makes clear the point.
>
> please set up your mailer to wrap lines below 80 characters per line.
Sorry, yeah.
