On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:46:59PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 09:55:01AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > > I"m baffled as I've got SA running and its definitely picking up a LOT > > of stuff, but as I've said previously, the stuff that's getting > > through my SA to my local mailboxes is the same stuff that's hitting > > me through d-u. And its all got really high spam scores listed in the > > d-u headers, so why is it getting through? and what is the threshold > > at which murphy dumps it? There are a couple in my d-u inbox right now > > with amavis scores of over 30 but they are called "OK". And they're > > getting through my SA.... I need to tweak my SA so it always includes > > the spam score (doesn't currently) and see what its scoring here. but > > it almost seems like someone has figured out how to trick SA into > > letting a high score through. > > I'm not running SA, but my ISP does. Look what I get for two of those: > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on relay1 > > X-Spam-Level: ** > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=INVALID_TZ_GMT,RCVD_BY_IP > > autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1 > > and the second > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on relay2 > > X-Spam-Level: > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE > > autolearn=disabled version=3.1.1
That's what I don't understand. Things with a du assigned spam score of over 30 were 1) getting through the list, i wonder what the threshold was at, though it now seems to be fixed, and 2) getting through my local SA. I got my SA/exim configed so that I can see SA headers on every mail right about the time we stopped getting pounded through d-u so i don't have anything to compare at this point :( A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature