On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 08:31:39PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > How have you managed to break mutt to the point where it doesn't > > understand attachments? I'm awed; mutt is an excellent MIME client. > > Maybe chapter 5 of the mutt manual would be helpful? > > And pray tell just what are attachments doing on Usenet?
Since when was this Usenet? (Hint: Usenet == big-8 newsgroup hierarchies, netnews == newsgroups in general. Usenet most certainly isn't whatever random gateway you're reading this through.) > So the question should be: "Since when does *slrn* deal with attachments?" > Which doesn't make a lot of sense. If you're doing something weird then you should expect to have to cope with weirdness yourself; please start by not breaking every thread you respond to. > It seems to me that others should do the same. > > > Not-to-mention that sending attachments is verboten on every mailing list that > I have ever subscribed to, as are HTML mails. > > > Henceforth I will simply killfile anyone on the list who does either. Bye-bye. Attachments are not remotely in the same league as HTML mails. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
