Am 2007-09-22 00:00:09, schrieb Mumia W..: > It probably is good technology. But I think it should be good > technology--elsewhere. > > Including SElinux in Debian is not like including tuxracer. Too much of > the core security parts of Debian have to be changed to accommodate SElinux. > > If I want SElinux, I should get Redhat or Fedora. But I use Debian, and > I'd like to be SElinux-free here.
Sorry, I do not like Redhat/Fedora since updateing of HA-Servers is a mess.
I no use Debian sind over 8 years and I am "Debian GNU/Linux Consultant"
and have installes Debian on over 4000 Computers since 1999.
Debian SElinux-free would be one of the biggest errors in the history of
Debian. I am reals sure, that there are MORE serverinstallations as
Workstations based on Debian.
> Manoj said that SElinux is not yet fully integrated into Debian, and I
> think that's good because it gives us time to re-evaluate if we need
> SElinux, and I hope we can re-evaluate it out of Debian.
Forget it, I think, even if Manoj is already working on a SElinux enforced
distribution, all of his work should be go into Debian GNU/Linux.
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
