This is new.  I've been getting these directly to me too after I post.
What can Debian do about this?

It seems that some newsgroup has decided to tie into the list but then
rejects everything noisilty back to the posters.  

Doug.



----- Forwarded message from Moderation Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:34:28 -0400
From: Moderation Robot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: Repost of some earlier described "challenges"
To: "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:02:03 +0200 (CEST)

linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway
with a mailing list.

Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program
and has been refused because:

this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users.
You can register for posting by subscribing to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list. You can do so by sending a message with "subscribe" in the
body at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] address or by visiting
http://lists.bofh.it/listinfo/linux-gate .


For more information about the linux.* hierarchy please read the FAQ
at http://www.linux.it/~md/linux-faq

Virtually your,
The Moderation Robot.

------- Follows the first few lines of your article --------
From: "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: linux.debian.user
Subject: Re: Repost of some earlier described "challenges"
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:50:08 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Porchlight-Mailscanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more 
information
X-Porchlight-Mailscanner: Found to be clean
X-Mailscanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2007-05-24_01
X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/498731
List-ID: <debian-user.lists.debian.org>
Organization: linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 21:40:00 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bytes: 2527
X-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:51:17 GMT 
(bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net)
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Trace: b59cb46fed768ef7b7d1a22875
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:35:04AM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Douglas A. Tutty shared this with us all:
> >--} One of the later steps is to upgrade from latest sarge to latest-etch.
> >--} Etch is now at r1. ?The tested upgrade path is r0. ?Since so much
> >--} changed between r0 and r1, there may be problems; I don't know.
> >--}
> 
> I have installed several machines with the first netistall etch CD since the 
> above change and have found no breakages. Update and then upgrade have worked 
> a treat. Just watch the prompts.



----- End forwarded message -----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to