Their "work" imposes opportunity costs on software development efforts. They by themselves don't have the ability to defend a statement like "fixing this security hole will be more economically beneficial to society than those features software development people were working on implementing". Some of those rogue crackers are also only interested in their own economic benefit to the exclusion of the rest of society. What makes all of this worse is that specific first level cancelled feature additions are the only ones any software developer is in a position to document as being lost because of cracker activity. None of the follow on features that may have been requested and implemented as a result of new users using those first level features will ever be known.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to