Well, this is interesting... I just received a "Sorry, Access Denied"
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I wasn't aware of having sent him
anything (see attachment). How come...? My mail filtering inserts a
"Reply-To: <list-address>" header into list mails, so I just hit 'r'
and it automatically goes to the list. Turns out that Alan's list
posts have a "Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" header, so when I
hit 'r' to reply to one of his posts, it went to him direct as well as
to the list, and I hadn't noticed. Now... do I change my mail
filtering settings, or start a flamewar about Reply-To headers in list
posts in conjunction with challenge-response systems? :-)

-- 
Pigeon

Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 02 00:53:42 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pigeon by pigeon.pigeonloft with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19ijiQ-0005II-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:53:42 +0100
Received: from nestie.pigeonloft ([192.168.1.2] ident=mail)
        by pigeon.pigeonloft with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19ijiP-0005I4-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:53:41 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=pigeon)
        by nestie.pigeonloft with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
        id 19ijnm-0004tE-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:59:14 +0100
Received: from pop3.ukonline.co.uk [212.135.6.253]
        by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.9.11)
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop);
        Sat, 02 Aug 2003 00:59:14 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.122])
        by store5.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
        id 19ihwH-000C2g-3R
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 01 Aug 2003 22:59:53 +0100
Received: from sdn-ap-003watacop0138.dialsprint.net ([63.187.208.138]
        helo=localhost)
        by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
        id 19ihwr-0001JU-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 01 Aug 2003 15:00:29 -0700
Received: by localhost (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
        Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:01:39 -0700
From: Alan Connor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 15:01:39 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Old-Subject: Re: Is there a *console* screen capture
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sorry, Access Denied.
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spambayes-Classification: ham; 0.09




 ************************************************* 
 *     This is a computer-generated response     * 
 ************************************************* 


          [Mailbox-Sentry-Program in use] 


               Greetings, Stranger.         


   Sorry about this, but there is NO other way to
   to effectively block spam.                 


   Please include the password   e45gGw1112092 

   anywhere on the Subject line, and use plain text  
   if you can.


   then kindly re-send your mail to:


   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


   [ You MUST use the password with the same ] 
   [ address that you acquired it with.      ] 


   This is a ONE-TIME thing. 


   Thanks for your understanding. 


 ************************************************ 
 *            SPAM       FREE       ZONE        * 
 ************************************************ 





Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to