Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>  On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 01:03:20AM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> > Gabriel Parrondo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > >  El jue, 27-12-2007 a las 07:20 -0800, Raquel escribi=3DC3=3DB3:
> > > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:15:54 +0530
> > > > "Amogh Hooshdar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is there anything I can do to suppress this warning like making the
> > > > > system believe that I trust ftp.us.debian.org or whatever mirror I
> > > > > am using.
> > > > 
> > > > Install debian-archive-keyring
> > >  
> > >  I always wonder how does that happen (which is very often). How can
> > >  anybody miss that package if apt depends on it??
> > 
> > (0) heretic /home/keeling_ aptitude show debian-archive-keyring
> > Package: debian-archive-keyring
> > State: installed
> > Automatically installed: no             # <--
> > Version: 2007.07.31~etch1
> > Priority: important                     # <-- but not that important?
> > Section: misc
> > Maintainer: Michael Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Uncompressed Size: 57.3k
> > Depends: gnupg (>=3D 1.0.6-4)             # <-- hmm ...
> > 
> > (0) heretic /home/keeling_ aptitude show gnupg
> > Package: gnupg
> > State: installed
> > Automatically installed: no             # <--
> > Version: 1.4.6-2
> > Priority: important                     # <-- again.
> 
>  I think Gabriel meant this:
> 
>  $ apt-cache rdepends debian-archive-keyring
>  debian-archive-keyring
>  Reverse Depends:
>    education-common
>    cdebootstrap-static
>    cdebootstrap
>    apt
>  ^^^^^^^

I agree, it's very confusing.  apt was not auto-installed here, and
once it was dragged in, I still had to get debian-archive-keyring
myself.

(0) heretic /home/keeling_ aptitude show apt
Package: apt
State: installed
Automatically installed: no
Version: 0.6.46.4-0.1
Priority: important
Section: admin
Maintainer: APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Uncompressed Size: 4415k
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1-12), libstdc++6 (>= 4.1.1-12),
         debian-archive-keyring

Is this "new" etch dependency handling?  How's it work now?


-- 
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*)    http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html      Linux Counter #80292
- -    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html    Please, don't Cc: me.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to